Date of Entry: [REDACTED]
Decryption Protocol: d/wb01
Extracted File: Arctic Military Program Report.txt
Decrypted by: Gaara XYZ Unit [GXYZU-9]
Ciphertext Block Integrity: 85% (Partial Data Loss)
00:>0E00:;0<<00R00<:00;>00R
Drone Vision: Marked as the Other, retinal tracking mirrors elements entering a specific visual field, or the limit definition of all that your vision can see as the Other has been trained, or seeing is the set of assembled mechanisms that map the visual surface.
The eye is not able to see without the assembly: “Geometry” that appears as trainable input assisted-by. Or “the eye” is thus a cognitive process capable of signifying ageometry in a constant geographical learning -the eye itself is impossible-.
Marked as the Other, what are your given pieces? Or the collection of data accumulate in an accident-body / your given pieces accumulate in repetitions and re-formations of the possible in a cybernetic technology that tends towards absolute contingency (1). Or “marked” reveals the functionality of horror as material value (2): a line extends, a map emerges on which you are “marked”. Or being a sign is an Arctic military program trained from a desert bunker; the engineering of metaphysics is the production of linearities and intersections:
Geometric command has a
circle-shaped output around a highly magnetic cold-axis. The approach to the object leads to the hardware efficiency of the new planetary economy system: Entropy is the Other.
We begin by going over the sequences that “it” expels while it moves in circles in its apparatus -360º vision- only that “it” does not see as I see. We will call “it” as “wet” or the numerical significance of a cube followed by the physical characteristics of mercury -mercury glove (3)-. How will his gesture be? Throw a sign: QBHGLQ8613
Verbalize the sequence: 13:02 section 6 ,172 or 173 cm, 3 km/h direction northeast, (probably crouched).
Change route: Assimilation.
Start over: We begin by reviewing the sequences that QBHGLQ8613 expels while riding in circles on his bicycle while playing the flute. We’ll call QBHGLQ8613 as mercury; it’s the wet residue of an Arctic military techno-linguistic program spawned by the Notre Dame summit or how to reside from your marrow.
Throw a sign: Cube-Box-Mercury (chemical)-Liquid-Quantum-Eight (Cube)-Six (Cube)-One is the beginning of the wet state-Density.
Verbalize sequence: 13:48 section 2, 168 to 170 cm, 5 km/h northbound (probably accompanied by an animal: dog)
Change route: Absorption.
Start over: We begin by reviewing the sequences that the Wet Box expels as he rides in circles on his bicycle while playing the flute while building a sand tower while writing the “poem of language”. We will call Wet Box as the Structure of Emplacement: It produces the Unknown, is not the hand that plays an agent that assembles me, or “I” defining the Other with the tool with which I navigate the Unknown? Shall we forget “the eye”?
Throw a sign: d/wb -desert/wet box- is a cybernetic techno-linguistic program that seeks to explore navigation beyond vision using abstraction models, encryption codes and digital media.
Verbalize sequence: 15:17 section 6, 180 cm, 6 km/h northbound. Change route: Action.
00<:0<<
Object/Target: Do you dream of the hand that caresses your tongue? Of the glass from which you drink? Do you know the place through which what falls moves? Discovering the Object / Target, a tower of smoke, ash on a face, we imagine ourselves crawling across the surface of the circle, cutting our body / we cut our flesh / there are times when I remember the piece that is my body / there are times when I know my body as a piece / there are times when I know myself to be the thin thread of that badly cut. Is there something in this body that wants to connect to things? Do you seek to connect to things? Things, if there is a small hole with golden fibers in the middle and you look through what do they see? Do they see the temples that were erected? The ruin of the little text box. Box and form.
00<00:;0<<0<<00U00E
Cathedrals: The abstraction of a box is the opening of the box (4): text box and encrypted form that constitutes the feedback process that resignifies the text box and its content as a text box.
We will call this recursive process of resignification of the text box “wet”. The text box is a body of faces that reformulate the language in a continuum.
The text box is what we look at when we have to locate a swarm in a risk section -section 2, section 6, blue section, section 9, tokenized K-section…-.
The text box determines the number of potentiality agents (<capable<of<being>fragmented>as<An Object>-again, this time different-).
The text box is an Arctic military program -the end of every system-wrapped in a web of recursive ex-formation and in-formation that agitate the possibility of the map.
The text box is a succession of vanishing points breaking into another succession(s) of vanishing points.
How does one make / Cathedrals / out of a text box?
The text box is a large metallic rock inter-linked as a black cube inter-linked as a line of ornaments inter-linked as the tower of a thousand and one arches inter-linked as a sand plaza inter-linked as a desert beetle inter-linked as the serial number inter-linked as a space that ends inter-linked as a piece of mirror inter-linked as my great castle inter-linked as the sphinx on a rooftop inter-linked as the snake beneath the ground inter-linked as blood on dry skin inter-linked as the combustion of a candle inter-linked as the midnight photograph inter-linked as the mouth hole inter-linked as the path returning through the river basin inter-linked as the dune you sit on inter-linked as the bicycle and the flute inter-linked as the bouncing ball inter-linked as the burning house of mama inter-linked as the dream of a fading slumber inter-linked as the drawing of a spiral inter-linked as a sequence of zeros inter-linked as the potentiality of objects.
d/BunkerTool: We begin by reviewing the encrypted report annotations describing the “d/Bunker Tool” game / describing intra-activity (5) with an apparent open-cycle environment. Here, the “wet” value denotes the process’s ability not only to absorb contingencies but to produce them. The opening of the circular map permits such from / arising out of the contingent necessity of the entities that form it and/or are produced. Wet space.
d/Bunker Tool appears as a gestalt-environment where figure and ground coexist: “The figure is the figure of the ground, and the ground is the ground of the figure” (6). A navigable environment composed of chambers containing / producing abstract technological agents; abstract machines, broken faces. That is, the object’s potentiality as an infectious apparatus characteristic.
d/Bunker Tool is a linguistic archive that puts into play the performativity of technique as an Arctic military program: The desert appears in many forms as a vast plane; it is where it arises, and, being its own cause, the entity emerges as a metaphysical telos (7). The bunker is a vast Black Box constantly recoding the technical potentialities escaping object-becoming. It is, thus, in the necessity of its constant ageometry, a cybernetic machine. The object is something that lacks duration (8), something stopped in time (9), the solid does not last, a game without memory.
d/Bunker Tool constitutes a space that destroys the token as a sign by extracting its meaning; the wet-tokenization shown as a contingent interface allows for the non-linear evolution of the signifier of each presented piece. On the piece, you will see the sign’s potentiality. The Arctic military program is a relational practice that shapes a possible value system / the game arises by collectivizing the experience of the possible (10).
d/Bunker Tool seeks to parasitize the ground as an agent incapable of fragmenting; intra-activity always determines and potentially defines it.
From itself arise xeno-entities that allow bunker navigability. It constantly revises possible assembly models in order to generate aniconic, asignifier, moral/value systems, regarding the understanding of technology as recursive mediation with the user’s cognitive possibility. On a carpet, you will see an abstract piece, upon it, a small text box: “An arrow, a vanishing point, over the desert, east and west.”
d/Bunker Tool is (in) the desert cathedral and temple / escape is impossible / you will find pieces composing a home appliance / assassination weapon.
0T0:; 0;:0<<0<0R
Oeconomicus Map: We begin by reviewing a .pdf titled “Instructions and Parts for Assembling a Dyson V15 Detect”. QBHGLQ8613 takes irregular turns on his bicycle while playing the flute while building a sand tower while writing the “language poem” while making a speculative map of a house basement while generating potential stones and rocks with inscriptions while decoding a thermal image of a “cold spot” moving over trees while rewriting the history of a river in India while taking .png images of nightscapes while analyzing magnetogrammetries of the Arctic circle.
:::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::
- Hui, Yuk. Recursivity and Contingency. Media Philosophy, 2019.
- Fisher, Mark. Flatline Constructs: Gothic Materialism and Cybernetic Theory. Exmilitary Press, 2018.
- Morente, Enrique. Omega. El Europeo Música, 1996. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFvmrW7G8S4.
- Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Columbia University Press, 1994.
- Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, 2007.
- Hui, Yuk. Op. cit.
- Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology. Harper & Row Publishers, 1977.
- Bergson, Henri. Matter and Memory. Zone Books, 1991.
- Lispector, Clarice. Água Viva. Penguin Books, 2014.
- Parajua, Marcos. Instagram Publication, 2022. https://www.instagram.com/p/CbzmVQDqU52/.
:: DIFFRACTIONS :: 